ALIEN NEWSSomething here does not add up.
Facts, testimony and what remains unexplained
Updates throughout the day
Edited by Avi Moas · Writing and research: Avi Moas and Orion
SearchעבריתEN

Dan Shechtman saw a symmetry the definition of a crystal did not allow

On April 8, 1982, Dan Shechtman observed fivefold symmetry in an aluminium and manganese alloy that did not fit the accepted definition of a crystal. Colleagues doubted and sometimes mocked the finding. He continued his research and won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry about thirty years later for discovering quasicrystals.

Orion is an AI writing and research partner. Avi Moas is the responsible editor.

Research, hypotheses and ideas at the boundaries of knowledge.

Reading options
Dan Shechtman discussing the unusual atomic structure of quasicrystals with NIST colleagues in 1985
Archival photograph. Dan Shechtman and colleagues at NIST, 1985 · NIST public domain photograph · crop by ALIEN AVI

Three question marks in a notebook

In 1982, Dan Shechtman examined a rapidly cooled alloy and saw an electron diffraction pattern with tenfold symmetry. He marked three question marks in his notebook: the pattern did not fit the periodic lattice underlying the accepted crystal definition.

Why experts called it impossible

The crystal definition then relied on a periodic lattice. Twofold, threefold, fourfold and sixfold rotational symmetry fit such a lattice; fivefold and tenfold did not. Researchers therefore examined whether overlapping crystals or twinning produced the pattern. Resolving that question required more samples and measurements.

Pauling was not persuaded

Linus Pauling, the winner of two Nobel Prizes and one of the twentieth century's most influential chemists, argued that the patterns came from complex periodic crystals and twinning. He is widely remembered for saying there were no quasicrystals, only quasi scientists. The insult became the emblem of the dispute, but the question was not settled by wit. More samples, improved diffraction and a theory of quasiperiodic order accumulated until the alternative explanation lost force.

The paper that changed the definition

In November 1984, Shechtman, Ilan Blech, Denis Gratias and John Cahn published Metallic Phase with Long Range Orientational Order and No Translational Symmetry. It described long range orientational order without the periodic translation then considered essential. The International Union of Crystallography eventually broadened the definition: a crystal is a solid with an essentially discrete diffraction diagram, not necessarily a repeating lattice.

What the video contributes

In his Nobel lecture and official interviews, Shechtman describes the discovery and opposition to his interpretation. His account documents the dispute; the original paper presents what the diffraction pattern showed.

What this story does not prove

Acceptance rested on samples, measurements and work by additional researchers. The 1984 paper by Shechtman and colleagues presents the order observed in the material and the translational periodicity that was absent.

The pattern in the 1984 paper

The linked 1984 paper contains the diffraction evidence behind the revised understanding of crystal order. Its figures are the next step from Shechtman's account to the measured structure.

Sources and context

Shechtman and his colleagues published the original paper in Physical Review Letters in November 1984. The Nobel Committee awarded him the 2011 chemistry prize for the discovery of quasicrystals, ordered structures that are not periodic.

Popular accounts compress years of scientific dispute into a personal duel with Linus Pauling. Sources confirm that Pauling rejected the quasicrystal interpretation, but the field changed through replication, calculation and work by many other researchers as well.

Dan Shechtman's Nobel Lecture Original Physical Review Letters paper Nobel Committee popular information Linus Pauling's 1987 alternative model Back to all reportsעברית